Performance and Training
Two modules that sit next to each other in Talent & Growth and are usually run by the same people.
For the processes rather than the screens, see Running a Review Cycle and Managing Training.
Performance Management
Section titled “Performance Management”The module is built in two layers. Indicator Categories, Indicators and Goal Types are the vocabulary — define them once. Review Cycles, Employee Goals and Employee Reviews are the activity that uses it.
Indicator Categories
Section titled “Indicator Categories”Performance Management → Indicator Categories
The groupings performance indicators fall into — Technical Skills, Communication, Leadership, Reliability.
Categories keep a review readable. Twenty ungrouped indicators is a form nobody finishes; four categories of five is a form people complete properly.
Indicators
Section titled “Indicators”Performance Management → Indicators
The individual things somebody is rated on — Meets deadlines, Quality of work, Supports colleagues.
Indicators belong to a category, and can be tied to a department or designation so that engineers and salespeople are not assessed against the same list.
Goal Types
Section titled “Goal Types”Performance Management → Goal Types
The kinds of goal people can be set — Revenue, Personal Development, Project Delivery, Quality.
Review Cycles
Section titled “Review Cycles”Performance Management → Review Cycles
A cycle is a review period — “H1 2026”, “Annual Review 2026”. It has a start date, an end date and a status.
The cycle is what makes reviews comparable. Reviews belonging to one cycle can be reported on together; reviews scattered across the year cannot.
Employee Goals
Section titled “Employee Goals”Performance Management → Employee Goals
Goals set for individuals: the employee, the goal type, what the target is, the dates it runs between, and progress against it.
Progress is updated as the goal is worked on, so the review is not the first time anybody looks at it.
Employee Reviews
Section titled “Employee Reviews”Performance Management → Employee Reviews
The reviews themselves — who is being reviewed, by whom, in which cycle, and whether it is complete.
Creating a review pulls in the relevant indicators to be rated, with space for comments and usually an overall rating and summary.
Training & Development
Section titled “Training & Development”The training module has the same two-layer shape:
Training Type → Training Program → Training Session → Employee Training → Assessment
Training Types
Section titled “Training Types”Training & Development → Training Types
The category training falls into — Technical, Compliance, Onboarding, Leadership. Types can be associated with departments.
Training Programs
Section titled “Training Programs”Training & Development → Training Programs
A program is a course that can be run more than once — “Fire Safety Awareness”, “Advanced Excel”. It holds the description, the type and the duration.
Training Sessions
Section titled “Training Sessions”Training & Development → Training Sessions
One actual running of a program: a date and time, a trainer, a location or link, and attendees.
The calendar view is the better way to spot scheduling clashes.
Employee Trainings
Section titled “Employee Trainings”Training & Development → Employee Trainings
The record of which employee did which training — the question the module exists to answer. This is also where training somebody completed elsewhere gets recorded, so a person’s history is complete.
There is a dashboard summarising training activity.
Training Assessments
Section titled “Training Assessments”Training & Development → Training Assessments
Checks on what people took away — a test, a practical, a sign-off. Results are recorded per employee, keeping attended and passed as separate facts.
Common questions
Section titled “Common questions”Can somebody review themselves? Self-assessment depends on how you run the cycle. The system records reviews and reviewers; who reviews whom is your process, not a system rule.
We changed an indicator mid-cycle. Reviews already completed keep what they were rated against. Expect the cycle to be inconsistent, and prefer changing indicators between cycles rather than during one.
Can we run the same program twice? Yes — add another session. That is what the program and session split is for.
Somebody missed a session. Record them absent rather than removing them. “Scheduled and did not attend” is a more useful fact than “never scheduled”.
How do I prove somebody is trained? Their Employee Trainings record, plus the assessment result where there was one. Which is the reason to record both promptly.

